Abstract: 
										It is maintained that the justice interpretation on stealing crime stipulates aggravated punishment.for recidivist,which violates the principle of crime-penalty stipulated by law and infringes Legislative power and it should be canceled;Abstractly,to legislate the judical interpretation has its constitution basis;on reflecting the meaning of creterion for statutory punishment and crime of amount,we conclude that The judical interpretation does not set forth aggravated punishment principle for stealing recidivist.
									
																									Key words: 
																																						   aggravated punishment for recidivist, 
																																							   legislation of justice interpretation, 
																																							   creterion for statutory punishment:crime of amount 
																												
																								摘要: 刑法学界普遍认为关于盗窃罪的司法解释规定了累犯加重处罚原则,违反了罪刑法定原则,侵犯了立法权,应该取消;从抽象的角度来看,司法解释立法化有我国宪法的依据;通过对“法定刑的限度”以及“数额犯”的反思,我们认为该司法解释并没有创设累犯加重处罚原则。
																								关键词: 
								   																																   累犯加重处罚 , 
																																											   司法解释立法化 , 
																																											   法定刑限度 , 
																																											   数额犯 
																													
															
                            
                                                        
                            
                            
                                
                                    
                                
                                
                                    
																				                                              ZHOU  Xiang, QI  Wen-Yuan. Study of Criminal Justice Interpretation on Aggravated Recidivist[J]. , 2008(5): 140-146.
																																																					周详, 齐文远. 刑事司法解释中的“累犯加重犯”之研究[J]. 法学家, 2008(5): 140-146.