Abstract: The newly revised Arbitration Law adds provisions targeting false arbitration, furnishing statutory grounds for regulating such conduct.As stipulated in Article 61 of the Arbitration Law, false arbitration falls into two categories: unilateral fabrication of facts and malicious collusion between both parties, which requires constituent elements including qualified subjects, fabricated legal relations and subjective malice.At the arbitration hearing stage, the principle of good faith serves as the theoretical foundation for regulating false arbitration.Nevertheless, false arbitration arising from bilateral malicious collusion is plagued by difficulties in evidence production.Furthermore, the contractual nature of arbitration dictates against introducing a mandatory third-party intervention system.At the judicial review stage, obstacles exist when parties seek to set aside or refuse enforcement of arbitral awards generated by false arbitration under the grounds of forged evidence or violation of public interest prescribed in Article 71 of the Arbitration Law.Establishing a mechanism allowing outsiders to apply for vacatur of arbitral awards would contravene the relativity of res judicata of arbitral awards.Accordingly, false arbitration shall be designated as a statutory ground for people's courts to set aside or refuse enforcement of relevant arbitral awards.In terms of legal liabilities, the Civil Code shall be applied to clarify civil tort compensation liabilities arising from false arbitration.Meanwhile, a crime of false arbitration should be incorporated into the Criminal Law to fill the gap in criminal regulation.

Key words: New Arbitration Law, False Arbitration, Judicial Review, Tort Liability, Crime of False Arbitration

摘要： 新《仲裁法》增设虚假仲裁条款,为规制该行为提供了立法依据。《仲裁法》第61条所指虚假仲裁包括单方捏造事实与双方恶意串通两种类型,需具备主体适格、虚构法律关系、主观恶意等构成要件。仲裁审理阶段,诚信原则是规制虚假仲裁的理论基础,但恶意串通型虚假仲裁存在举证难困境,且仲裁契约属性决定不宜引入强制第三人制度。司法审查阶段,依据《仲裁法》第71条中伪造证据、违背公共利益情形申请撤销和不予执行虚假仲裁裁决存在障碍,设立案外人撤销裁决制度有违仲裁裁决既判力的相对性,虚假仲裁行为应成为人民法院撤销和不予执行仲裁裁决的法定事由。法律责任方面,应依据《民法典》相关规定明确虚假仲裁的民事侵权赔偿责任;在刑法中增设虚假仲裁罪,填补刑事规制空白。

关键词: 新《仲裁法》, 虚假仲裁, 司法审查, 侵权责任, 虚假仲裁罪