摘要: 本文结合中国法院和英国法院对中国国际经济贸易仲裁委员会仲裁庭作出的福克公司仲裁案的裁决所实施的监督,阐述了在国际商事仲裁实践中,裁决地法院撤销其本国裁决和执行地法院拒绝承认与执行外国仲裁裁决的理由。作者认为,在国际商事仲裁立法与实践上,无论是仲裁地法院依法撤销或者执行在其境内作出的涉外仲裁裁决.还是执行地法院依法承认与执行外国仲裁裁决.均不对裁决所涉及的实体问题进行审查和监督。对仲裁裁决的司法复审与监督一般仅涉及程序方面的事项。
关键词:
福克公司案 ,
仲裁裁决 ,
承认与执行
Abstract: This article studied grounds for which the Chinese court refused to set aside the arbitral award madeby the arbitral tribunal of the China International Economic and Trade Arbitration Commission(CIETAC)as to the case ofFerco,as well as that of the British court refusal to award the Ferco’S request for refusing recognition and enforcement ofthis CIETAC’s award.It is the author’S view that either the court of the state where the award Was made or the court ofthe state where the recognition and enforcement was sought should not review the merits of the award in addition to reviewthe procedure issues.
Key words:
the case of Ferco,
arbitral award,
recognition and enforcement
赵秀文. 从福克公司案看法院对我国涉外仲裁裁决的监督[J]. 法学家, 2005(2): 154-160.
ZHAO Xiu-Wen. Court Supervising to Arbitral Award of Involved Foreign in China from the Case of Ferco[J]. , 2005(2): 154-160.