摘要： 中国刑法第13条但书在理论上有争议，在实践中却一直被作为出罪依据使用。将120份但书作为出罪依据的判决书作为研究样本，以犯罪论体系中的基本要素作为横坐标，以适用但书出罪的依据作为纵坐标，可以从宏观和微观两个角度透视但书在司法实务中的实际适用情况。通过分析发现，但书条款存在“错用”和“滥用”两种情形，反映出司法实务部门对于但书内涵的认识不足。基于这种现状，应当对但书条款作出正确的功能定位，重新阐释其合理内涵。
关键词:
但书,
出罪体系,
情节显著轻微,
危害不大
Abstract: The proviso in Article thirteenth of the Criminal Law has been debated in theory for a long time，but it has been applied on judicial practice.Based on 120 judgments，which have applied the proviso for decriminalization，with basic elements of constitution of crime as abscissa and the reasons for application of proviso as ordinate，we can research the actual legal application for proviso from macro and micro perspectives.Through analyzing data and cases，we can discover the misuse and abuse for the application for proviso，which reflects the lack of knowledge for the proviso.Facing this situation，it is necessary to make the reasonable location of the proviso and reinterpret the proper connotation of the proviso.
Key words:
Proviso,
Decriminalization,
Circumstance,
Obviously Minor,
Little Harm
王华伟. 中国刑法第13条但书实证研究
——基于120份判决书的理论反思[J]. 法学家, 2015(6): 88-100.
WANG Hua-Wei. Empirical Research on the proviso in Article Thirteenth of the Criminal Law：A Theoretical Reflection Based on 120 Judgments[J]. , 2015(6): 88-100.