摘要： 近代法学的起源是西方法律史的核心问题，数百年来争论不断，并且以波伦那大学和伊尔内留斯为中心，较为清晰地呈现出“建构”与 “解构”这两个相反相成的论述脉络，塑造了法律史学内在的性格矛盾。唯有细致梳理西方学界对于伊尔内留斯问题的研究史，揭示以伊尔内留斯为中心的客观历史与主观历史之间的巨大反差，我国法学界对于西方法学发生史的理解偏差才能得到修正。

关键词: 法学发生史, 伊尔内留斯, 注释法学派, 学说汇纂, 萨维尼

Abstract: The origin of modern law is the core issue in western legal history, which experiences continuous academic debate during hundreds of years.With the discussion of the Irnerius' Question, two kinds of contradictory narrative paradigm between Construction and Deconstruction emerged, which made legal history get its character with the contradictions.By combing the study of Irnerius' Question, the article aims to reveal the significant contrast of Irnerius between the objective and subjective history, in further, to correct the deviation in general understanding in Chinese textbook of legal history.

Key words: Jurisprudence's Renaissance, Irnerius, Glossator, Ius Commune, Savigny