法学家

• 论文 • 上一篇    

《民法典》第1184条(侵害财产造成财产损失的计算)评注

李承亮,法学博士,武汉大学法学院副教授。   

  • 出版日期:2021-11-15 发布日期:2021-11-16

Comments on Article 1184 of the Civil Code(Calculation of Property Damage Caused by Infringement of Property)

Li Chengliang,Ph.D. in Law,Associate Professor of Wuhan University Law School.   

  • Online:2021-11-15 Published:2021-11-16

摘要:

《民法典》第1184条并未对侵害财产民事责任的承担作出一般规定,而只是针对侵害财产造成财产损失的赔偿责任作出规定。对于侵害财产造成的直接损害而言,该条文主要适用于将该损害折算成价值损失予以赔偿的折价赔偿,不适用于填补该损害本身的恢复原状费用赔偿。该条文规定的基础计算方法仅仅适用于直接损失的计算,不能用于否定间接损失的可赔偿性。对于间接损失而言,区分恢复原状和价值赔偿没有意义。间接损失并非被侵害财产的价值损失,因此只能按照其他合理方式计算。在坚持按照基础方法的时间标准计算直接损失的同时,可以将被侵权人因价格上涨受到的损失作为间接损失另行计赔。

关键词: 价值赔偿, 折价赔偿, 市场价格, 直接损害, 间接损失

Abstract:

Article 1184 of the Civil Code does not provide general provisions on the civil liability for property infringement,but only provides for the compensation liability for property damage caused by infringement of property rights.For the direct damage caused by the infringement of property rights,this provision is mainly applicable to discount compensation which converting the damage into a loss of value,and does not apply to compensation for restoration fees which filling the damage itself.The basic calculation method stipulated in this article is only applicable to the calculation of direct damage and cannot be used to deny the compensability of indirect loss.It is meaningless to distinguish between restoration and value compensation when compensating for indirect loss.The indirect loss is not a reduction in the value of the infringed property,so it can only be calculated in other reasonable ways.While insisting on calculating the direct damage in accordance with the time standard of the basic method,the loss suffered by the infringed party due to the price increase may be calculated separately as indirect loss.

Key words: Value Compensation, Discount Compensation, Market Price, Direct Damage, Indirect Loss