摘要：

由于我国土地管理实体法相关制度的缺失，《行政诉讼法》关于征收决定属于人民法院行政诉讼受案范围的规定，在集体土地征收领域长期难以得到落实。当我国的集体土地征收制度从“分级限额征收体制”转变为“分级多阶段实施征收体制”，且后一体制在2020年进一步完善之后，将市县政府作出的“征收公告”界定为“对外发生法律效力的征收决定”具有合理性和必要性。不过，鉴于集体土地征收程序中的先行行为与征收公告共同构成了一个征收决定，而不是分别构成数个独立的行政行为，人民法院在审查集体土地征收决定合法性时，应当对征收公告以及相关先行行政行为一并进行审查，而不能只审查该公告本身的合法性。

关键词:  

Abstract: As substantive law of land management of China does not clearly stipulate the expropriation decision system，the stipulation of the Administrative Litigation Law that the expropriation decision belongs to the scope of administrative litigation of the people’s court，is difficult to implement in the field of collective land expropriation in long term.When the system of collective land expropriation in China had changed from“graded quota expropriation system”to“graded multi-stage implementation expropriation system”，and the latter expropriation system has undergone further institutional changes after the promulgation of the Land Management Law in 2019，it is reasonable and necessary to define the expropriation announcement made by the municipal and county governments as the expropriation decision within the current legal order.However，as the fact that the prior acts and the expropriation announcement in the collective land expropriation procedure constitute a decision of expropriation，rather than several independent administrative acts，when examining the legality of collective land expropriation decision，the people’s court should examine the expropriation announcement and related prior acts together，rather than the legality of the announcement itself.

Key words: Expropriation Announcement, Expropriation Approval, Expropriation Decision, Judicial Review