摘要: 组织型平台从业者自主性与劳动控制并存的工作特点,产生了司法审判实践以及理论研究中对其劳动关系存在与否的争议,争议的实质是对其应否适用劳动法倾斜保护的价值判断的分歧。平台从业者虽然具有相异于线下劳动者的工作特点,但其与平台或其合作企业之间同样是劳动力与生产资料相结合的合同关系,同样处于谈判能力不对等的弱势地位,因此平台从业者同样应获劳动法的倾斜保护。对于平台从业者倾斜保护这一价值判断的制度回应,首先需要通过劳动关系的认定明确平台从业者的劳动者身份,在此基础上,针对平台从业者与线下劳动者相比存在的工作自主性,进一步思考现行劳动法具体制度适用的解决方案。
关键词:
组织型平台从业者,
价值判断,
劳动关系从属性,
倾斜保护,
谈判能力的弱势地位
Abstract: The work characteristics of organizational platform practitioners coexisting autonomy with labor control have led to disputes over the existence of their labor relations in judicial trial practice and theoretical research, and the essence of the dispute is the difference in value judgments on whether they should be inclined to be protected as laborers in the sense of labor law.Although platform practitioners have different work characteristics from offline laborers, the contractual relationship between them and the platform or its cooperative enterprises is also a combination of labor and means of production, and they also have no equal negotiation ability with the platform or its cooperative enterprises, so platform practitioners should also receive the tilting protection of labor law.As for the institutional response to the value judgment of platform practitioners' preferential protection, first of all, it is necessary to clarify the identity of platform practitioners through the identification of labor relations.On this basis, in view of the work autonomy of platform practitioners compared with offline workers, we should further consider the solutions applicable to the specific systems of the current labor law.
Key words:
Organizational Platform Practitioners,
Value Judgment,
Subordination of Labor Relations,
Tilt Protection,
Weak Position of Negotiation Ability
董文军. 组织型平台从业者劳动法保护之价值判断[J]. 法学家, 2022(6): 72-86.
DONG Wenjun. Value Judgment of Labor Law Protection for Organizational Platform Practitioners[J]. The Jurist, 2022(6): 72-86.