摘要: 刑法学界普遍认为关于盗窃罪的司法解释规定了累犯加重处罚原则,违反了罪刑法定原则,侵犯了立法权,应该取消;从抽象的角度来看,司法解释立法化有我国宪法的依据;通过对“法定刑的限度”以及“数额犯”的反思,我们认为该司法解释并没有创设累犯加重处罚原则。
关键词:
累犯加重处罚 ,
司法解释立法化 ,
法定刑限度 ,
数额犯
Abstract: It is maintained that the justice interpretation on stealing crime stipulates aggravated punishment.for recidivist,which violates the principle of crime-penalty stipulated by law and infringes Legislative power and it should be canceled;Abstractly,to legislate the judical interpretation has its constitution basis;on reflecting the meaning of creterion for statutory punishment and crime of amount,we conclude that The judical interpretation does not set forth aggravated punishment principle for stealing recidivist.
Key words:
aggravated punishment for recidivist,
legislation of justice interpretation,
creterion for statutory punishment:crime of amount
周详, 齐文远. 刑事司法解释中的“累犯加重犯”之研究[J]. 法学家, 2008(5): 140-146.
ZHOU Xiang, QI Wen-Yuan. Study of Criminal Justice Interpretation on Aggravated Recidivist[J]. , 2008(5): 140-146.