摘要: 量刑程序改革过程中出现了相对独立的量刑程序和隔离式的量刑程序两种方案。在解决不认罪案件量刑程序问题上,隔离式量刑程序更加合理,也符合法律的规定。隔离式量刑程序适用于被告人不认罪的案件,在对被告人有罪与否的决定先作出后再启动,由控辩双方分别提出量刑证据并发表意见,最后进行量刑问题的总结陈词。在量刑程序改革中,其他应当解决的问题还包括检察官的量刑建议权、社会调查报告制度的建立以及量刑程序的证明过程等重点问题。
关键词:
量刑程序,
隔离式,
相对独立的量刑程序,
芜湖模式
Abstract: Currently there are two different reform plans for sentencing procedure of China' criminal trial:relatively-in-dependent sentencing procedure and totally independent sentencing procedure. Totally independent sentencingprocedure is more reasonable than relatively independent sentencing procedure and in addition it is not againstcurrent Criminal Procedure Law of China. Towards the cases in which defendants plea no guilty, totally indepen-dent sentencing procedure request verdict of guilty or no guilty at the first step, then prosecutors and defendantsprovide evidences on sentencing for the judge, then they do final arguments for their own opinion for sentencing.Other important issues about establishing independent sentencing procedure include prosecutor's recommendationon sentencing, social investigation of pre-sentence and proving process of sentencing.
陈卫东. 论隔离式量刑程序改革——基于芜湖模式的分析[J]. 法学家, 2010(2): 1-8.
CHEN Wei-Dong. On Independent Sentencing Procedure:From the Perspective of Wuhu Pilot Model[J]. , 2010(2): 1-8.