摘要： 本文由专利侵权诉讼引出对我国停止侵权民事责任的思考和探讨，认为其不同于英美法系中的禁令制度，两者在设立宗旨、适用对象、适用条件等方面均有不同。司法实践中的典型案例已经突破了停止侵权当然适用论。应在充分论证的基础上，基于民事责任的一般原理，同时借鉴英美法系国家的禁令制度，就我国专利侵权诉讼中停止侵权民事责任的适用范围、适用原则、适用方式等做出具体规定，以确保司法的统一性。

Abstract: Initiating from the patent infringement litigation on the thoughts and disscution on the civil liability of cessa-tion of infringement, the article holds that such liability applied in China differs from the injunction system in thecommon law system in terms of the aim of its institution, application scope and conditions. Some typical examplesin judicial practice have ruled out the doctrine of universal application of cessation of infringement. On the basisof thorough demonstration and the general principle of civil liability, and with reference to the injunction system as applied in the common-law system, China should specify the application scope, principles and modes to ensurethe uniformity of its enforcement.

Key words: Patent hnfringement, Cessation of Infringement, Civil Liability;Injunction