法学家 ›› 2012, Vol. 0 ›› Issue (3): 55-70.

• 论文 • 上一篇    下一篇

论刑法中的没收

张明楷,清华大学法学院教授。   

  • 出版日期:2012-06-15 发布日期:2012-06-21

On Confiscation of Property under the Criminal Law

  • Online:2012-06-15 Published:2012-06-21

摘要: 我国刑法既规定了一般没收,也规定了特别没收。一般没收具有存在的理由,不应废除。没收供犯罪所用的本人财物,虽然具有没收财产刑的内容,但只能归入保安处分;对“供犯罪所用的本人财物"应限制解释为“供犯罪所用的,并且与违禁品相当的本人财物"。“犯罪分子违法所得的一切财物"是指符合犯罪构成要件的违法行为所得的一切财物,不以行为人具有责任为前提,对之适用没收规定时,应当区分不同种类的没收,并实现相关规定的目的。

关键词: 没收, 财产刑, 个人财物, 一般没收, 特别没收

Abstract: Our country's penalty includes common confiscation, as well as special confiscation. The common confiscation has its legitimacy of existence, therefore it should not be abolished; the confiscation of the criminal's own properties used in the crime, though which has the content of the penalty of confiscation of property, can only be integrated into security measures; the criminal's own properties that were used in the crime should be restrictively interpreted as the criminal's own properties that were used in the crime and with the nature which is equivalent to prohibited articles; all properties illegally obtained by a criminal refer to all properties obtained by a criminal’s illegal conduct fulfilling the constitution of crime, which are not under the premise that such criminal should have the criminal responsibility; as to the application of provisions of confiscation under the criminal law, different categories should be divided, and the aim of relevant provisions should be achieved.

Key words: Confiscation, Punishment of Property, Individual Property, Common Consfication, Special Consfication