摘要： 我国行政裁量研究受到较多域外理念影响。基于迥异的法制与法学背景，各国裁量概念及其控制模式存在着差异。英美法系国家多采用广义裁量概念，侧重于用政治性手段控制裁量；大陆法系国家则采用狭义裁量概念，倚重于法律模式来控制裁量。尽管两种模式有融合趋向，但仍显著不同。我国行政裁量概念在学理上虽有广义与狭义之分，但实务中裁量概念界定不清，致使行政诉讼实务中存在大量不予审理的情况。建构中国化的裁量控制模式应兼采两大法系控制模式之优势，即在规则制定和适用裁量中淡化立法与执法的区分，并在执法裁量的司法控制层面上细分裁量类型。

关键词: 行政裁量, 裁量控制模式, 司法控制模式, 政治控制模式, 滥用职权

Abstract: The study of administrative discretion is highly influenced by foreign concepts in our country. Because of the different legal institutions and legal background, there are large differences in the discretion concept and its control mode to all countries. Without careful analysis, it will lead to the plight of the concept of chaos. Through the investigation of connotation of the administrative discretion concept and type differences between two important legal systems, we find that common law countries who apply separation of powers often use the concept of generalized discretion, and focus on the political means to control discretion. The continental legal system countries who apply legal method doctrine often use the special discretion concept, heavily relying on law modes to control discretion. Although the two modes have tendency of integration, there  are still some significant differences on substantial law. Even though in our current system of administrative  discretion exists the general and narrow concept points, the administrative litigation system only pays attention to the control of the most special discretion. Construction of discretion control pattern with the distinct Chinese characteristics should adopt the advantages of the two common control modes, weakening the distinction between the regulations and applicable legislation and law enforcement discretion, and further refining the types of discretion in law enforcement discretion control level.

Key words: Administrative Discretion, Control Mode of Discretion, Judicial Control Mode, Political Control Mode, Misuse of Powers