摘要： 我国刑法学界在如何完善过失论的问题上，存在激烈争论。尽管客观归责论对过失论的发展作出了重要贡献，但其自身在方法论上也存在许多不足。客观归责论与传统过失论在方法论上既有联系，又有区别，因此，并未构成对其全面超越。批判客观归责论本身，并不等于完全否定客观归责方法论。我国刑法过失论不应存在路径依赖，在适当借鉴客观归责方法论的基础上，即使不全面引入客观归责论，也能合理追究过失犯的刑事责任。我国学者对新过失论的批判不能成立，它比修正的旧过失论更为可取。我国刑法理论应以新过失论为主线，使之贯穿过失犯刑事政策学、过失犯总论和过失犯各论，通过完善过失论体系，强化过失的规范认定。

关键词: 客观归责论, 修正的旧过失论, 新过失论, 危惧感说, 结果回避义务

Abstract: There is fierce debate over how to perfect theory of criminal negligence in China.Although theory of objective attribution made important contributions to it development, it has serious defects in methodology.There are some connections and differences between theory of objective attribution and traditional theories of criminal negligence.Criticizing theory of objective attribution itself doesn't deny the methodology of objective attribution completely.The theory of criminal negligence in China doesn't exist path dependence, it should appropriately learn from methodology of objective attribution rather than introducing itself totally to reasonably investigate criminal liability of negligence crime.New theory of criminal negligence is more desirable than modified old theory of criminal negligence.Criminal jurisprudence in China should take new theory of criminal negligence as a main line, make it embedded in criminal policy, general provisions as well as specific provisions of negligence crime, so as to perfect the system of negligence theory and strengthen normative identification of negligence.

Key words: Theory of Objective Attribution, Modified Old Theory of Criminal Negligence, New Theory of Criminal Negligence, Theory of Fear Sence, Obligation of Avoiding Result