摘要： 虽然国际条约要求缔约方制止规避技术措施的行为，但对禁止规避的范围，各国有不同理解和做法。考虑到国际条约的立法原意和提供规避手段造成的严重后果，我国没有必要禁止直接规避技术措施的行为，因为直接规避技术措施行为并非对著作权的直接或间接侵权，禁止直接规避行为缺乏实际意义而且很难执行。不禁止直接规避行为可以为“合理使用”留下适当空间，是符合我国国情的合理选择。

关键词: 技术措施, 提供规避手段, 直接规避行为, 合理使用

Abstract: The international copyright treaty requires contracting states to prohibit the circumvention of technological measures.However, in the respect of the prohibition scope, there are different provisions in different countries.Given the legislative purpose of the international treaty and the serious adverse impact of providing means to circumvent the technological measures, it is justified for China to prohibit the provision.It is not necessary, however, for China to prohibit the act of direct circumvention since such an act is not a direct or indirect infringement of copyright, and the infringing acts followed the circumvention have been regulated by the current copyright law.In addition, the prohibition against the direct circumvention is difficult to be implemented.A copyright law that does not prohibit the act of direct circumvention is not only consistent with the international copyright law, but also leaves the room for fair use of works.

Key words: Technological Measures, Provision of Means of Circumvention, Direct act of Circumvention, Fair Use