摘要： 可撤销法律行为在撤销权行使方法上存在诉讼撤销与自主撤销两种制度模式。诉讼撤销模式与罗马法上借助于程序手段来塑造当事人的法律关系这一传统有关。自主撤销更多地尊重私人自治，便于当事人自主安排其法律事务，而诉讼撤销更多地体现了国家的控制。在中国民法典编纂中，对于可撤销的法律行为，应该抛弃传统的带有普遍性的诉讼撤销模式，将自主撤销确定为原则，只有在有特别的利益需要强化国家的保护和干预的时候，才设立诉讼撤销模式。

关键词: 形成权, 诉讼形成权, 可撤销法律行为, 自主撤销, 诉讼撤销

Abstract: There are two methods of the rescission of revocable civil juristic acts, juridical revocation and non-juridical revocation on one's own initiative.The method of juridical revocation is related to the tradition in Roman law in which the civil juristic relations was formed by procedural method.Juridical revocation reflects the controlling from states, while non-juridical revocation reflects the respect of individual autonomy in case that the parties arrange their legal affairs on their own initiative.In the process of compiling Chinese civil codification, for revocable civil juristic acts, the traditional way of commonly using juridical revocation should be abandoned and replaced by using method of non-juridical revocation as principle.Juridical revocation should only be used when there are special interests which need strong protection and adjustment from authority.

Key words: Gestaltungsrecht, Gestaltungsrecht Exercising in Juridical Procedure, Revocable Civil Juristic Acts, Non-juridical Revocation on One's Own Initiative, Juridical Revocation