摘要： 保护规范理论主张，公法规范必须包含“私人利益保护指向”，才能确认该规范会生成主观公权利。这一理论不仅促成了客观公法规范与主观公权利的互相剥离，也为个人公法权利的判定提供核心指针。保护规范理论自提出开始历经方法的变迁、规则的调整和重心的转移，并逐渐形成架构完整的理论谱系。我国行政审判自2017年明确采用保护规范理论，并将其作为判定原告资格的重要基准。这一基准的纳入不仅使我国行政诉讼原告资格的判定有了清晰的思考步骤，也使对原告权益的保障摆脱了诉讼法明确列举的桎梏，而转向对行政决定所涉及的客观法规范的保护意旨的解释。

关键词: 保护规范理论, 主观公权利, 原告资格

Abstract: The theory of protection norms holds that public law norms must include“the protection of private interests”in order to confirm that the norms will generate subjective public rights.This theory not only contributes to the separation of objective public law norms and subjective public rights, but also provides the core guidelines for the determination of individual public law rights.The theory has undergone the changes of methods, the adjustment of rules and the shift of emphasis and gradually formed a complete theoretical pedigree.China's administrative trial has been incorporated into the theory of protection norms since 2017, which is regarded as an important benchmark for judging the plaintiff's standing.The incorporation of this theory not only sets clear standard for the determination of plaintiff's qualification in administrative litigation, but also makes the protection of plaintiff's rights and interests completely get rid of the shackles of the doctrine of enumeration in the procedural law, and turns the question to the interpretation of the protection intention of objective legal norms.

Key words: Theory of Protection Norms, Subjective Public Rights, Plaintiff Qualification