摘要：

将污染环境罪的罪过形式限定为故意，既是遵从立法修订意图和坚持文理解释的必然结论，又是对污染环境罪之行政犯本质及其体系性地位的恪守尊重，还是遵循罪刑均衡的比例性要求进而实现制裁配置的分配正义的理性自觉。至于过失污染环境行为，轻者由前置法单独归责处理，重者由前置法与过失危害公共安全犯罪的刑法共同惩治，因而“过失说”和“复合罪过说”均不是法秩序统一视野下的行政刑法所应秉持的教义。而故意说在司法实践中的贯彻，则应区别污染环境罪中直接故意支配下的行为犯和间接故意支配下的结果犯的具体认定。

关键词: 污染环境罪, 行政犯, 故意说, 行为犯, 结果犯

Abstract:

Restricting the culpability form of the environmental pollution crime to“intentional”is a consequential result of abiding by the purpose of the criminal law amendment and insisting the literal rule of law interpretation，respectfully sticking to the administrative-crime nature and the systemic positioning of the environmental pollution crime，also a reasonable awareness of accessing distributive justice through the sanction configuration up to the requirement of the proportionality principle of crime-punishment equilibrium.As to the negligent offenses of environment pollution，the slight ones shall be sentenced solely according to prepositioning laws and the serious ones according to the combination of prepositioning laws with the criminal regulations on public security.Thus，neither“the theory of negligence”nor“the theory of compound culpability-form”could be considered the dogma that administrative criminal law shall stick to in the perspective of the uniformity of legal orders.With regard to the implementation of“the theory of intention”in legal practice，the specific affirmation of behavioral offenses conducted with direct intent and consequential offenses conducted with indirect intent among environmental pollution crimes shall be differentiated.

Key words: the Environmental Pollution Crime, Administrative Crime, the Theory of Intention, Behavioral Offense, Consequential Offense