摘要： 算法权力虽然强大,但仍可能受到规避,与其治理对象之间持续存在动态博弈关系。规避算法的基本策略,包括避免成为治理对象、调整满足治理要求与混淆迷惑治理主体。这一现象的成因在于技术的刚性有限,且不匹配处理边际性治理问题时所需要的利益衡量,无法将所有“标准”转化为“规则”,解决不了多元规范秩序背后的根本性社会矛盾。然而,大多数人并非算法规避者,算法权力总体有效;少数的算法规避也有利于限制算法权力,平衡治理与自由,促进社会稳定与治理的综合效率。只需坚持包容审慎的规制原则,在通过技术加强规制简单的算法规避之同时,对复杂的算法规避保持容忍,同时发挥社会规范的规制作用。

关键词: 算法规避, 法律规避, 互联网治理, 多元规范, 法律与科技

Abstract: Although the algorithm power is strong, it may still be evaded, and there is a continuous dynamic game relationship between it and its objects of governance.The basic strategies of evasion of algorithm include avoiding becoming the objects of governance, adjusting to meet the requirements of governance and confusing the subjects of governance.The reason for this phenomenon is that the rigidity of technology is limited, and it does not match the balance of interests required for the treatment of marginal governance issues.It is unable to convert all “standards” into “rules” and solve the fundamental social contradictions behind the pluralistic normative order.However, most people are not evaders of algorithm, and the algorithm power is generally effective.A few evasions of algorithm also help limit the algorithm power, balancing governance and freedom, and promoting social stability and the comprehensive efficiency of governance.We only need to adhere to the principle of inclusive and prudent regulation, strengthen the regulation of simple evasions of algorithm, maintain tolerance for complex evasions of algorithm, and explore the regulative role of social norms.

Key words: Algorithm, Evasion of Algorithm, Legal Evasion, Internet Governance, Pluralistic Norms, Law and Technology