摘要： 比较分析表明，《罗马规约》与中国刑法在犯罪故意的种类、犯罪故意的认识因素和意志因素等许多方面存在相同之处。但同时，在确定故意的标准、价值判断的要素以及心理要件概念的适用方面也存在着明显的区别。
关键词:
《罗马规约》 ,
中国刑法犯罪故意 ,
比较研究
Abstract: After comparing mental element provided in Article 30 of the Rome Statute with the counterpart in the Chinese criminal law，we can find that they share a lot in common with reference to the variety，volitonal and cognitive components of intention．In the meantime，some differences can also be found between them such as reference point of intention，components concerning Value judgment，and the applicable priority of the definition for intention．
Key words:
the Rome statute,
criminal law of china,
Intention,
comparative study
高铭暄, 王俊平. 《罗马规约》与中国刑法犯罪故意之比较[J]. 法学家, 2005(4): 62-66.
GAO Ming-Xuan, WANG Jun-Ping. A Comparative Study on the Provisions with Respect to Intention between the Rome Statute and the Chinese Criminal Law[J]. , 2005(4): 62-66.