摘要： 如果说有关私法上的人格权之讨论在近年已近乎白热化，那么宪法中的人格权却还只是“小荷才露尖尖角”。然而，在德、日等国的法制史上，一般人格权的概念却曾经先由宪法条文中引出，转而反哺于私法；而倘若忽视宪法上的人格权理论，则不可能完整理解民法上的人格权。从德、日诸国精致丰富的人格权理论观之，人格权内涵中最具特征的当是其“概括性”，它以保护人格的自主发展为主轴，特别保护隐私权、名誉权和自我决定权等。然而，为了克服其内容上的这种宽泛性和多元性，两国法院也确立了人格权的范围理论和多重审查基准，为人格权的保护和限制划定相对明确的界限。凡此种种，均值得吾人借鉴。

关键词: 人格权 , 宪法上的人格权 , 内涵 , 范围理论审查基准

Abstract: If discussion about personality right in civil law have been incandesced，the same study of constitutional law is very scare．As German and Japanese legal practice has revealed，however，general personality right in constitutional law has thrived and can also nourish civil law in reverse．So if we ignore theories of personality right in constitution，it is impossible to understand personality right in civil law．In Germany and Japan，the most uniqe feature of personality right in constitutional law is its“comprehension”．Personality rights focus on the protection of serf-development of personality and particularly protect right to privacy，right to reputation and right of self-determination and SO Off．Meanwhile in order to counteract the universality and multiplicity of its content，the Courts in both nations created sphere theory and multi—standards of constitutional review and ultimately draw a clear line for protection and restriction of personality right in constitutional law．Au of these experiences deserveto be borrowed by us．

Key words: Personality Right, Personality Right Constitutional Law, Connotation, Sphere theory, Standards of Constitutional Review