摘要： 群体性侵害事件的处理是当代社会的重要课题，中国三鹿奶粉事件的行政主导处理和日本c型肝炎诉讼案的立法与司法结合、合并和解各有千秋，都提供了重要的启示和经验。本文通过对两案的比较，在分析其利弊的同时，指出其共同特点：在处理大规模群体性侵害事件时，积极开拓多元化处理机制，寻求善治；以对受害人的救济为核心，选择最有利于受害人获致救济的处理方式；政府责任的扩大及积极处理；基于特定体制、社会环境与条件的灵活处理。

关键词: 三鹿奶粉事件c型肝炎诉讼案, 群体性侵害事件, 集团诉讼, 多元化处理

Abstract: How to deal with the groups tort incident is an important issue in contemporary society. In China, the Sanlu milkpowder incident is settled by an utive-led way, and in Japan， the hepatitis C litigation was settled by a new way of combined with legislation, justice and group-settlement. Both of them have provided important inspiration and experiencefor this world. This paper compares the two cases, the analysis of its pros and cons at the same time, pointing out theircommon characteristics : deal with the groups tort incident by multi-ways and to seek good governance, to the remedy ofvictims at the core, select the ways most in favor of the victims' remedy; the expansion of government responsibility; the flexibility based on the specific system, the social environment and conditions of a state.

Key words: Sanlu Milk Powder Incident, Hepatitis C Litigation of Japan, Class Action, Groups Tort Incident;