法学家 ›› 2011, Vol. 0 ›› Issue (6): 124-136.

• 论文 • 上一篇    下一篇

刑事庭审虚化的实证研究

何家弘
中国人民大学   

  • 出版日期:2011-12-15 发布日期:2012-04-20

Empirical Studies on Nominalization of Criminal Court Trials

  • Online:2011-12-15 Published:2012-04-20

摘要: 在刑事诉讼过程中,庭审本应是中心环节,但是在当下中国却被“虚化”了。刑事庭审虚化主要表现在举证的虚化、质证的虚化、认证的虚化、裁判的虚化四个方面。导致刑事庭审虚化的原因包括:以侦查为中心的流水线诉讼模式;以案卷为中心的法官审理模式和下级服从上级的行政决策模式。确立直接言词原则和改良人民陪审员制度是实现刑事庭审“从虚转实”的可行路径。

关键词: 刑事庭审, 庭审虚化

Abstract: The court trial should be the central stage in criminal proceedings.However, it is nominal in China now.The nominalization of cnminal court trials shows in the nominalization of producing evidence, the nominalizationof impeaching evidence, the nominalization of evaluating evidence, and the nominalization of court-makingjudgments. The causes of the nominalization include the procedure model of assembly line with investigation cen-teredness, the judges' assessment model of cases based on files, and the administrative decision making modelwith the principle of the lower level subordinating to the higher level. For changing the nominal trials to substan-tial trials, it is a practical road to establish the principle of immediateness and oral, and to reform the people' sjurors system.

Key words: Criminal Court Trial, Nominalization