摘要： 为妥善解决现代社会中的群体性纠纷，德国、意大利、奥地利、法国、瑞典、丹麦、挪威以及我国台湾地区等很多国家或地区在传统的不作为之诉的基础上，出现了团体损害赔偿诉讼。相对于不作为之诉，团体提起赔偿之诉时，在当事人适格、诉讼目的与功能、诉讼的资金支持等很多方面，涉及的问题较为复杂。就我国而言，目前构建团体诉讼的知识积累尚有不足，实践中则存在“立法休眠、司法躁动”的困惑，有必要在深入研讨的基础上分别对团体不作为之诉与团体损害赔偿之诉作出规定。

关键词: 团体诉讼, 不作为之诉, 损害赔偿之诉

Abstract: In order to solve the group disputes in the modem society properly, Germany, Italy, Austria, France, Swe-den, Denmark, Norway，Taiwan of China and many other countries or regions make provisions of damages litiga-tion filed by a association, besides the traditional injunction litigation. Different from the injunction litigation,when an association files the damages action, there will be more complex problems which involve the standing tofile a suit, the action aim and function, the funds for litigation and so on. As for contemporary China, there areinsufficient knowledge accumulation of building the association litigation system nowadays，and in the same time,there exists the confusion about how to fulfill the principle of “dormant legislation, judicial agitation” in practice.Therefore, it is necessary to make provisions of the injunction litigation and damages litigation separately on thebasis of a thorough research in the future.

Key words: Association Litigation, Injunction Litigation, Damages Litigation