法学家 ›› 2012, Vol. 0 ›› Issue (1): 108-120.

• 论文 • 上一篇    下一篇

隐私权概念的再界定

  • 出版日期:2012-02-15 发布日期:2012-04-22

Re-definition of Right to Privacy

王利明,法学博士,中国人民大学法学院教授 ,中国人民大学民商事法律科学研究中心专职研究员。   

  • Online:2012-02-15 Published:2012-04-22

摘要: 隐私权在我国虽然已经得到广泛承认,但是关于其边界等问题仍然存在争议,需要继续研究。隐私权固然存在宪法上的基础,但是主要属于民事权利的范畴。它的具体属性应当是具体人格权而非一般人格权,而且应当在我国未来的《人格权法》中得到规定。隐私权主要包括生活安宁和私人秘密两个方面,未来隐私权的内容也应当以此为基础进行发展和扩张。个人信息资料权不宜纳入隐私权的范畴,它是相对独立于隐私权的一种权利。

关键词: 隐私权, 民事权利, 具体人格权

Abstract: Right to privacy, which is well accepted in China, still needs more research, because the problems such asboundary of it and so on have no consensus yet. Although right to privacy has the basis of constitution, it shouldbe a civil right. The attribute of it is concrete personality right rather than general personality right, and shouldbe regulated by personality right law. Right to privacy mainly includes peace of life and private secret. The development of right to privacy should base on these two aspects. Right to personal data distinguishes itself fromright to privacy and should be regulated separably.

Key words: Right to Privacy, Civil Right, Concrete Personality Right