摘要： 大陆法系国家基于绝对权的物权请求权与侵权损害赔偿请求权的区分，导致其在知识产权间接侵权中适用停止侵害的问题上存在体系上的障碍。为此，大陆法系国家采用扩张解释的方法，将间接侵权纳入到权利侵害的概念之中。但上述做法可能会淡化间接侵权与直接侵权的界限，过度扩大知识产权保护范围，存在间接侵权的去过错化以及损害社会公众利益的危险。我国侵权法体系的特殊性，决定了在知识产权间接侵权适用停止侵害的问题上，大陆法系所面临的体系上的障碍体现得并不明显，但上述危险仍然值得注意。

关键词: 知识产权间接侵权, 共同侵权, 教唆侵权, 帮助侵权, 停止侵害责任

Abstract: In the continental legal system, there is the distinction between the injunction and damage. This forms one barrier when claiming for cessation of infringement in the case of indirect infringement. To overcome such difficulties, it is usually made expansion of the concept of breach of privilege to include the indirect infringement ．This approach could lead to the dilution of boundaries between direct infringement and indirect infringement. Through this method, there maybe some risks such as broadening the scope of protection of intellectual property rights excessively, ruling out the fault element in indirect infringement, and causing damage to public interest. In China,there is not such barrier as that of facing the continental law system because of the particularity of tort law system in our country，but such risks are noteworthy．

Key words: Indirect Infringement of Intellectual Property, Joint Infringement, Inducing and Contributory Infringement, Responsibility for Cessation of Infringement