摘要： 近年来我国民事诉讼中虚假诉讼频发，对司法公正造成了严重损害。虚假诉讼案件大多采用调解方式结案。为了应对虚假诉讼形成的调解书，立法机关增加了人民检察院对损害国家利益、社会公共利益的调解书提出抗诉或检察建议的规定。基于虚假诉讼形成的调解书损害的利益类型各不相同：有的损害了国家的经济利益，有的损害了社会的经济秩序，有的妨害了社会管理政策，有的损害了案外第三人利益。虚假诉讼损害的是复杂客体，所有的虚假诉讼都损害了国家司法上的利益和社会的公序良俗，因而对第三人利益造成损害的虚假诉讼的调解书也应当属于检察监督的范围。

关键词: 虚假诉讼, 调解书, 检察监督, 司法公正

Abstract: The frequently-brought false litigation has become a big problem in the civil litigation practice in recent years,which has caused very severe damages for the impartiality of the justice. Most of the false litigation adopted mediation to end the cases. In order to solve the problems brought by the false litigation, the legislatures added a provision that the procuratorate office shall protest or put forward procuratorate suggestions against those conciliation Statements that damage state interests and social public interests. The false litigation could be divided into different types, as a result, the interests damaged also represent very complicated situations, i. e., some damage the state economic interests, some damage the social economic order, some hinder the enforcement of the social management policy, and some damage the third parties ’ interests. False litigation cause damages for complicated objects, i. e., all types of the false litigations damage the state interests of justice and the social order. Consequently, the conciliation Statements that have damaged the third parties9 interests should fall under the realm of the procuratorate supervision.

Key words: False Litigation, Conciliation Statement, Procuratorate Supervision, Impartiality of the Justice