法学家 ›› 2015, Vol. 0 ›› Issue (3): 86-94.

• 论文 • 上一篇    下一篇

论标准必要专利诉讼的“公平、合理、无歧视”许可
——内涵、费率与适用

罗娇,中国政法大学民商经济法学院博士研究生。   

  • 出版日期:2015-06-15 发布日期:2015-07-01

On the FRAND License of Standards Essential Patent Litigation: The Connotation, Royalty Rates and Application

 Luo Jiao, Doctoral Candidate of China University of Political Science and Law.   

  • Online:2015-06-15 Published:2015-07-01

摘要: “公平、合理、无歧视”许可,又称FRAND许可,是标准必要专利权人不得拒绝许可,且许可费率不得高于该专利被纳入标准之前、有替代技术与之相竞争时的许可费率;对没有竞争关系的产品,可以适用不同的许可费率。许可费率的计算,既要确保专利权人继续参与标准的制定,又要确保标准实施者能够使用该标准。在司法适用上,应在标准必要专利侵权诉讼中慎用停止侵害责任和诉前行为保全等;在未来的立法或司法解释中,应解决FRAND许可与强制许可和经营者滥用市场支配地位之间的关系及程序衔接问题,明确违反FRAND许可承诺应承担的责任。

关键词: 标准必要专利, FRAND许可, 费率

Abstract: FRAND(Fair, Reasonable,and Non-discriminatory)license of standards-essential patent(SEP)means that licensor cannot refuse permission firstly; secondly,the royalty rates of the SEP cannot exceedthe royalty before the patent is incorporated into the standards, and the royalty which has been competingwith alternative technologies;thirdly,the non-competing products can apply different royalty rates. The royalty rates of SEP should ensure the patent holder’s continuing participation in standard setting, and ensurethe implementers’ implementing of the standard as well. In the judicial application,“ permanent injunction’and“temporary ban” should not be used in SEP infringement proceedings;and FRAND Licensing shouldbe coincided with the rules of compulsory licensing and operators’ abuse of market dominance relationships ina future legislative or judicial interpretation,and be restrained by duty rules.

Key words: Standards Essential Patent(SEP), FRAND License, Royalty Rates