摘要： 继承与遗赠被一同规定于《物权法》第29条，不免使人认为遗赠与继承均可直接引起物权变动。由此，产生物权效力的遗赠将导致承认意思主义的物权变动模式，打破现行法的既有安排。更为重要的是，为保障遗产债务获得清偿，受遗赠人必须在遗赠物的价值范围内负有清偿债务义务，混淆了遗赠与遗嘱继承的差别。此外，为平衡遗产债权人与遗赠人的利益，必须在现行法补充具体的规则，以限制受遗赠人行使物权，导致遗赠人的物权有名无实。《物权法》第29条不应被解读为立法者意图改变既有的遗赠效力，而是坚持传统的债法效力。

关键词: 遗赠, 继承, 债权请求权, 物权效力, 债务清偿

Abstract: As Article 29 of the Property Law includes inheritance and bequest，it is believed that both bequest andinheritance cause direct transfer in property rights. However，the effectiveness will lead to legatee to bear obligations，thus breaking the features of the pure advantage of grant in the legacy. More importantly，for ensuring the settlement of debts of the decedent，the intricate rules must be added. In addition，the effectiveness of property will lead to changes in patterns of doctrine of wills and break the existing law. Legateesshould be given claims of obligations law to bequests from the time，when legators die.

Key words: Bequests, Inheritance, Claims of Obligation, Effectiveness of Property, Liquidation ofDebts