摘要： 反不正当竞争法一般条款具体化的决定标准是利益平衡。良好的行业惯例是利益平衡的评价依据。爬虫协议目前虽然是行业公认惯例，但不能协调搜索引擎服务中的利益冲突，因而并不是良好的行业惯例。为了保护作者、搜索引擎服务产业及公众利益，作品传播者不能依爬虫协议阻止他人搜索。不过，搜索必须遵循一定的限度。在百度与360之间的诉讼中，双方都实施了不正当竞争行为。

关键词: 行业惯例, 不正当竞争, 一般条款, 爬虫协议

Abstract: The decisive criterion for specification of general clause in Anti Unfair Competition Law is the balance ofinterests. Favorable trade practice can be used as the basis to evaluate the interests balance. The robots exclusion protocol，though acknowledged as current trade practice，fails to coordinate the interest conflicts insearch engine industry. Thus it can not be accepted as a favorable trade practice. In order to protect the interests of authors，search engine industry as well as the public，it is suggested that work communicators cannot prevent others from searching based on the robot exclusion protocol. However, this kind of searchingmust be limited to a certain degree. In the lawsuits between Baidu and 360，both sides have conducted unfair competition.

Key words: Trade Practice, Unfair Competition, General Clause, the Robots Exclusion Protocol