摘要： 取消生产、销售假药罪罪状中“足以严重危害人体健康”只意味着对结果危险的否定，并不意味着对行为实质危险的否定。误解的起源在于司法解释观从结果无价值→行为无价值→形式犯的立场退却。从违法相对性理论来看，刑法中的实质危害性在定罪时必须要考虑，因为前置法基于其管制范围以及处罚手段的特殊性，往往更注重违法的形式性。刑事违法判断的相对独立性决定了其必然不能回避实质危害性，实质危害性成为违法性判断独立于前置法的重要依据。在生产、销售假药的认定中，对于法律的遵循和解读应当以满足生存需要为前提。

关键词: 生产、销售假药罪, 相对违法性, 实质危害, 报应

Abstract: Canceling the“enough to harm human health”in the article of the Production and Sale of Counterfeit Drugs Crime just means the negative of the risk of the results rather than the negative of the risk of behavior. The origin of misunderstanding lies in the retreat of the concept of judicial interpretation, from“consequential antivalue”to“behavioral antivalue”to“form crime”From the view of relative illegality theory, the substantial damage in criminal law must be taken into account in the conviction, because the pre-law based on the scope of the control and the particularity of the punishment always more focus on the formal illegality. The relative independence of the judgment of criminal illegality decides that it can not avoid the evalument of substantial damage, substantial damage is an important basis for the independent judgment of the criminal law from other law. In the identification of this crime, the following and interpretation of the law should be based on the premise of meeting the needs of survival.

Key words: the Production and Sale of Counterfeit Drugs Crime, Relative Illegality, Substantial Damage, Retribution