摘要： 刑民交叉案件的审理顺序并非由刑、民案件的关联形态决定的，司法解释确立的类型化的思路不仅没有达到预期的目的，反而加剧了实务中的混乱。妥当的解决方案是在《民事诉讼法》关于诉讼中止的规定的框架下，通过精确界定诉讼中止的“必要性”，限制“先刑后民”的适用范围。在界定“必要性”时，应当着重考虑刑事判决在民事诉讼中的预决力规则，以及刑、民案件不同的诉讼目的与证据规则，充分尊重民事审判权的独立性与专业性。

关键词: 刑民交叉, 先刑后民, 刑民并行, 刑事判决的效力

Abstract: The sequence of intercross of criminal and civil cases are not dependent on how the civil and criminal cases are related.Type division on intercross of penal and civil cases can not help to solve the problem but just add confusion.We should solve the problem under the civil procedure rule of suspension，make a clear definition of the“necessity”to suspension and limit the scope of priority of penal cases.In order to make a clear definition of the“necessity”，the effect of criminal judgements，the different aims of civil and criminal cases，and the different rules on proof should be taken into account.

Key words: Intercross of Penal and Civil Cases, Priority of Criminal Cases, Paralell of Penal and Civil Cases, Effect of Criminal Judgements