摘要：

主张盗窃不以秘密性为必要的“公开盗窃论”及其理由，建立在误解犯罪主客观方面的关系、定罪的思维过程、行为方式之于犯罪评价的意义等诸多刑法原理的基础上，体现出一种机械主义的认识论与方法论。包括盗窃在内的不法行为的主观罪过与客观要素，是一个相互依存且需要在相互印证中连带评价的统一体。定罪的思维过程并非从客观到主观的线性思维，而是在事实与规范、客观与主观之间往复循环的理解过程。盗窃的秘密性并非纯客观的行为要素，而是以主观恶性评价为指向，具有主客观方面的统一性因而无关认识错误的范畴。所谓“公开盗窃”，是基于对抢夺的片面理解得出的伪命题。

关键词: 盗窃, 抢夺, 不法行为方式, 主客观统一, 诠释循环

Abstract:

“Public Theft Theory”，which holds that confidentiality is not a necessity for the conviction of theft，as well as its reasons are based on a number of principles of criminal law，such as misunderstanding the relationship between the subjective and objective aspects of crime，thinking process of conviction and significance of behavioral patterns in criminal evaluation，which reflects a mechanistic epistemology and methodology.The thinking process of conviction is an understanding process that loops between facts and norms，objective and subjective，rather than a linear thinking from objective to subjective.Confidentiality of theft is orientated to subjective malignant evaluation，instead of being purely objective elements of action，which is unity of subjective and objective aspects and therefore does not involve misunderstanding.The so called“public theft”is a false proposition which is based on unilateral understanding of snatching.

Key words: Stealing, Snatching, Wrongdoing, Subjective and Objective Unity, Hermeneutics Cycle, Misunderstanding