摘要： “多元纠纷解决机制”命题的提出主要是为了实现案件合理分流,促进纠纷的实质性化解。在此框架下,各纠纷解决制度须遵循基本的司法原理和准则,在“纠纷解决”的主体、程序等要素上严守正义底线,以取得当事人的信任和青睐;须充分塑造和激活自身特色与优势,在“多元机制”内展开平等、有序竞争,以确保当事人的自由选择权得到真正扩充和保障。作为“多元纠纷解决机制”的构成,行政复议制度理应具有司法化和行政化之双重面相。两种面相并非截然对立、此消彼长的关系,只是观察角度、作用场域以及具体指向不同,是可以协同共存且互促互进的。行政复议制度唯有在司法化和行政化两个方向上同时发力,方能走出当前困局,逐步成为化解行政争议的主渠道。

关键词: 行政复议, 多元纠纷解决机制, 司法化, 行政化, 主渠道

Abstract: The proposition of a “pluralistic dispute resolution mechanism” is mainly to realize the reasonable diversion of cases and promote the substantive resolution of disputes.Under this framework, all dispute resolution mechanisms must strictly follow the basic judicial principles and norms and strictly abide by the bottom line of justice in the parties and procedure of “dispute resolution” in order to gain the trust of the parties; it is necessary to fully activate and give full play to their own characteristics and advantages and carry out the equal and orderly competition in the “pluralistic mechanism” to ensure that the parties' right of free choice can be substantially expanded.As the composition of the “pluralistic dispute resolution mechanism”, the administrative reconsideration system should have the dual aspects of judicialization and administration.The relationship between the two faces is not diametrically opposed to each other, but the observation angle, field of action, and specific direction are different, which can coexist and promote each other.Only when the administrative reconsideration system makes efforts in the two directions of judicialization and administration simultaneously can it get out of the current dilemma and gradually become the main channel to solve administrative disputes.

Key words: Administrative Reconsideration System, Pluralistic Dispute Resolution Mechanism, Judicialization, Administration, The Main Channel