摘要: 个人信息权益与数据产权关系阐释的前提是在承认人格利益专属个人的基础上明确个人数据财产利益的归属。个人数据财产利益由数据主体与处理者共同生成,并分别形成纵向和横向共生关系。基于个人数据财产利益的“共生机理”,数据主体与数据处理者之间的关系应从“对立竞争”转向“双向依赖”,权益位阶应从“绝对优先”转向“同步生成”,调整模式应从“排他赋权”转向“治理规范”。由此,个人信息权益与数据产权是将个人数据的不同利用权能分别赋予数据主体与处理者形成的两项平行权利。数据主体可通过个人信息权益实现个人数据财产利益的管理,数据处理者则因合法处理行为享有包括持有权、使用权、经营权等在内的数据产权。针对个人信息权益与数据产权的冲突,一方面应通过限缩同意撤回权的适用条件、细化删除规则并引入匿名化替代机制,协调数据未转移时的冲突;另一方面可依据转移目的合法性约束转移权行使,并以处理方式实质性变化或特别约定作为目的变更认定标准,协调数据转移时的冲突。
关键词:
个人信息权益,
数据产权,
数据共生,
治理财产
Abstract: The premise for elucidating the relationship between personal information rights and data property rights lies in clarifying the attribution of property interests in personal data, based on the recognition that personality interests inherently belong to the individual.The property interests in personal data are jointly generated by the data subject and the processor, forming both vertical and horizontal symbiotic relationships.Driven by the “symbiotic mechanism” of personal data property interests, the relationship between the data subject and the data processor should shift from “opposition and competition” to “mutual dependence,” the hierarchy of rights should shift from “absolute priority” to “synchronous generation,” and the regulatory model should shift from “exclusive entitlement” to “governance norms.” Consequently, personal information rights and data property rights constitute two parallel rights, formed by assigning different utilization powers over personal data to the data subject and the processor respectively.Data subjects can manage their personal data property interests through personal information rights, while data processors, by virtue of lawful data processing, enjoy data property rights encompassing possession, use, and operational rights.
Key words:
Personal Information Rights,
Data Property Rights,
Co-generated Data,
Governance-Property
王年. 个人信息权益与数据产权的关系释论[J]. 法学家, 2026(1): 30-45.
WANG Nian. On the Relationship between Personal Information Rights and Data Property Rights[J]. The Jurist, 2026(1): 30-45.