摘要： 建构中国国际法自主知识体系需要首先理解知识体系的重要性,而这可以借助知识与权力关系的理论框架展开分析。国际法知识的权力产生机制与国内法知识的权力产生机制存在重要区别。国际法知识与国际治理权力紧密相关,是塑造世界秩序的重要机制;其对权力的影响,不仅通过直观显性地影响政策、规则和裁判的方式实现,而且还通过塑造专业边界、界定研究议程、遮蔽核心问题等方式展开。中国国际法自主知识体系建构的关键在于议程自主性。国际法对应多国、国际和跨国三个层面的机制,涉及全球范围的知识共同体,因此在追求知识体系自主性时,需要重视共同性,而非一味强调特殊性。中国国际法自主知识体系的建构,不仅要考虑知识内容的生产,也需要重视知识筛选、分配和消费等环节的机制建设;不仅需要中国学者自身的积极参与,也要结合文明交流互鉴,面向国际知识共同体;不仅要立足于国际法知识共同体,还要向其他学科开放借鉴。

关键词: 中国国际法知识体系, 自主性, 知识—权力视角, 国际治理, 议程自主性

Abstract: In constructing China's autonomous international law knowledge system, it is critical to understand the significance of such a knowledge system, which can be analyzed within the theoretical framework of the relationship between knowledge and power.International law knowledge differs from domestic law knowledge in the mechanism by which knowledge generates power.International law knowledge is closely linked to the power of international governance and serves as an important mechanism for shaping the world order.Its influence on power is exerted not only by directly and explicitly affecting policy-making, rule-making and adjudication, but also in more subtle ways, such as shaping the boundaries of expertise, setting agendas, and obscuring critical issues.The key to constructing China's autonomous knowledge system of international law lies in agenda autonomy.Therefore, international law corresponds to multinational, international and transnational mechanisms and involves a global expert community.The pursuit of autonomy in the knowledge system rests on commonality rather than particularity.The construction of such an autonomous knowledge system requires not only the production of knowledge, but also the development of institutions for knowledge selection, circulation and consumption.It demands not only the active participation of Chinese scholars themselves, but also integration with exchanges and mutual learning among civilizations and mobilizing the international expert community.It should open to other disciplines rather than limiting to international law expert community.

Key words: China's International Law Knowledge System, Autonomy, Knowledge-Power Perspective, International Governance, Agenda Autonomy