摘要： 本文试图从宪法的角度审视司法实践中就法规冲突提请上级法院与其他机构裁决所带来的问题。文章认为，法院的提请安排不但会导致人民法院审判权的外部化，而且无法满足法的一致性与安定性要求。送请裁决政策还实际地影响了当事人的上诉权。文章认为，虽然法院采取司法提请有其现实考虑，但是宪法也规定了职权分工原则和独立审判原则。从宪法出发，应当允许法官对规范的选择进行独立判断。审判过程结束之后，司法误判的纠正则可以通过法律解释或宪法监督制度进行修补。文章认为这种思路既符合司法的要求，也符合我国的人民代表大会制度的根本要求。

关键词: 司法提请 , 法条冲突 , 司法政策 , 立法法 , 全国人大常委会

Abstract: This article aims to examine the constitutional consequence of judicial reference．According to a 2004 Supreme Court instruction，judges are required to refer their cases to higher level courts and various rule—makers，all the way up to the NPCSC．The consequence of judicial reference，as observed from practice，will not only extemalize the judicial process，but also will fail to entrench the integrity of law．As cases are referred to higher level courts，people’S right to appeal may be compromised．Although the referring policy has its realistic concems，the Constitution also asks for division of labor and independence of adjudication．Accordingly，judges should have independent authority to make the choice of law．In case of miscarriage of justice，either the appellate courts or the NPCSC may repair it eventual1y．This approach is in line with the nature of the judiciary and the fundamental requirement of congressional supremacy in the Constitution．

Key words: judicial reference, conflicts of laws, iudicial policy, lesislation law, NPCSC