摘要： 20世纪80年代以后，英美国家的法律人类学研究遭遇危机，而荷兰的法律人类学研究却风生水起。在英美国家的学术研究传统中，法律人类学一直都是人类学的分支领域之一，但从其产生、发展到如今的缓慢恢复，无不受到法学的影响。荷兰的法律人类学研究一直由法学院所推动，尽管在向人类学等社会科学靠拢的过程中受到了冷遇和排挤，但并没有影响该学科的发展。不过，若从学科沟通的角度来分析，荷兰和英美这两条路径都是失败的，因为同法学实现学科交叉的关键之处并不在于研究者和研究对象，而在于必须能够创造出一种能被法学认可的研究方法。相关领域的中国学者需要对此进行反思。

关键词: 法律人类学, 英美, 荷兰, 身份困境, 学科交叉

Abstract: After the 1980s, Anglo-American legal anthropology encountered a crisis, but Dutch legal anthropology has burgeoned. In Anglo-American research tradition, legal anthropology has always been a subdiscipline of anthropology, but from the birth, development to today's slow recovery, its every movement is influenced by the law. However, Dutch legal anthropology has been driven by the force of the law school, received a frosty reception and exclusion in the process to move closer to anthropology and other social sciences, but it did not affect the development of the discipline. However, if from the perspective of the disciplines communication, Dwtch and Anglo-American path both failed. Because the key point for interdisciplinary with jurisprudence is not the investigators and subjects, but a method must be created which can be recognized by jurisprudence. Chinese scholars in the field need adequate reflection.

Key words: Legal Anthropology, Anglo-American, Netherlands, Identity Dilemma, Interdisciplinary