摘要： 将民事推定的法律效果与证明责任直接勾连的研究范式具有逻辑上的不周延性。从当事人诉讼权利变动的角度来看，推定在改变证明对象、减缓推定受益方证明负担的同时，赋予了推定不利方推翻推定的程序反驳权。这样可以重新审视民事推定的法律效果：证明责任转移是推定不利方行使反驳权时的一种外在程序表现，并非推定的必然法律效果；举证责任倒置则是与推定并列的一种减缓当事人证明负担的方式，在逻辑结构和证明负担分配上与推定存在本质区别。

关键词: 民事推定, 法律效果, 证明责任, 诉讼权利变动, 程序反驳权

Abstract: As to the legal effect of civil presumption，traditional study inclines to connect it directly with litigant’sburden of proof. Such research paradigm is logically incomplete. Hence，it is necessary to switch from thetraditional perspective to the change of litigant’s procedural rights，namely in the process of mitigating theburden of proof of the presumption favored litigant by changing the object of proof, the opposite litigant isendowed with the procedural right to refute the presumed facts. Therefore，misunderstandings in this re-search should be clarified：the shift of the burden of proof is not the inevitable legal effect of the presump-tion，otherwise it is just a kind of procedural phenomenon appears when the opposite litigant exercises theright of refuting; inverting the burden of proof is parallel with the presumption as the manner of mitigatinglitigant’s burden of proof, and they have essential differences in logical structure and allocation of thelitigant’s burden of proof.

Key words: Civil Presumption, Legal Effect, Burden of Proof, Change of Procedural Rights, Pro-cedural Refuting Right