摘要： 在程序性裁判领域，法院所要面对的不是检察机关的指控是否成立的问题，而是控辩双方所发生的程序性争议如何解决的问题。在这种司法裁判活动中，被告人一般不会面临受到无根据和不公正定罪的危险，无罪推定原则失去了发挥作用的空间，司法证明活动也无需遵循严格证明的准则。目前，我国法律已经在非法证据排除领域初步确立了程序性裁判机制。与此相对应，法律也有待于确立一系列证据规则，从而设定有别于实体性裁判程序的证据准入规则、责任和证明标准。随着程序性裁判制度的逐步发展，这类证据规则也会得到相应的发展。

关键词: 程序性裁判, 无罪推定, 证据能力, 非法证据排除规则, 证明责任

Abstract: In the field of procedural adjudication, the issue to be resolved by the Court is not whether to establish theallegations of the prosecution or not, but how to settle the procedural disputes raised by the two parties ．In thisactivity of the judicial adjudication, the accused will generally not face the danger of unfounded and unfair con-viction，resulting in non-function of the presumption of innocence, therefore the activities of judicial proof neednot to follow the guidelines for strict identification. At present, Chinese law has preliminarily established themechanisms of procedural adjudication in the field of exclusionary rules of illegal evidence. Correspondingly，aseries of rules of evidence need to be established, so as to set a series of rules of evidence access, burden of proofand standard of proof, which are different from that in substantive adjudication. With the gradual development ofthe procedural adjudication, such rules of evidence would also get a corresponding elaboration.

Key words: Procedural Adjudication, Presumption of Innocence, Eligibility of Evidence, Exclusionary Rule, Burden of Proof