摘要： 全程同步录音录像不仅可以担保讯问笔录的证据能力，还可以提高讯问笔录的证明力。在“强制性录音录像”案件中，不规范的录音录像行为复杂多样，只有“不合理”的违法录音录像行为才会对讯问笔录的证据能力产生较大影响，但也并不必然使讯问笔录丧失证据能力，只会导致证据能力有瑕疵，此时，对讯问笔录的证据能力需要予以补正。补正的路径是通过证明讯问程序的合法性来保证供述的自愿性，从而恢复讯问笔录的证据能力。讯问程序合法的举证方是检察机关，证明方式采自由证明，证明标准应达到优势证据即可。

关键词: 录音录像, 讯问笔录, 证据能力

Abstract: From the perspective of the science of evidence, keeping an audio or visual record covering the entire process of interrogation not only ensures the admissibility of interrogation records, but also helps to improve the testimonial strength. There are various forms of keeping audio or visual records without complying with provisions. However, it is merely the ‘ unreasonable ’ forms of them that have negative effects on the admissibility of interrogation records, which not always lead to the total loss of admissibility. In this Situation, the admissibility of interrogation records is flawed which needs to be corrected. In order to restore the admissibility, one way of correction is to ensure that the randomness of confession is voluntary by the interrogation meeting the requirements of law. The legality o£ interrogation should be proved by People's Procuratorates with the method of free proof. Meanwhile, such proof should reach the preponderance of probability level.

Key words: Keeping an Audio or Visual Record, Records of Interrogation, Admissibility of Evidence