摘要: “互联网+”能够提升效率,也会放大风险,如何形成完善的规制结构亟待研究。网约车的规制问题引发热议。其中,是否规制、如何规制和谁来规制,是争论激烈,也是规制结构探究尤为重要的三个问题。在是否规制的决断上,需要明确政府—市场的活动边界。经济学知识和交通管理数据显示,网约车运营有着负外部性、信息不对称、形成垄断结构等特点,政府规制有着必要性,《行政许可法》提供了实定法上的判断和支撑根据。在规制方案上,应当建构平等、妥当和动态的规制体系。政府规制应当平等,以建构公平的竞争环境;应当根据运营形态妥当设定,以实现目的—手段的有效匹配;还应当能够适时调整,实现动态规制。为了实现有效规制,还需要在中央和地方立法之间进行妥当分工,实现中央的框架性立法和地方因地制宜立法的有机结合。最终,形成“互联网+”规制的系统合作框架和分层分类结构。
关键词:
网约车规制,
“互联网+”规制,
政府规制,
行政法治
Abstract: “Internet Plus”may amplify risk while it improves efficiency.It is a priority to research the regulatory structure.There
are controversies on the issue of regulation of“App-Based Ride and Taxi Services”, especially the issues of whether, how
and who to regulate.We need a clear government-market boundary to determine whether to regulate.“App-Based Ride and Taxi
Services”may lead to negative externalities, information asymmetry and monopolistic structure.Regulation is essential for
it is supported and controlled by“The Administrative Licensing Law”.The regulation program should be equitable,
appropriate and dynamic.It should be equal to ensure fair competition.The proper measures should be chosen to achieve the
purposes of regulation.It also should be adjusted dynamically.In order to achieve effective regulation, the central
legislation should establish a fundamental regulatory structure followed by the local regulatory measures.Eventually, a
layered and classified regulatory structure could be constructed in a systematic and cooperative framework.
Key words:
“App-Based Ride and Taxi Services”Regulation,
“Internet Plus”Regulation,
Administrative Regulation,
Administrative Rule of Law
陈越峰. “互联网+”的规制结构
——以“网约车”规制为例[J]. 法学家, 2017(1): 17-31.
CHEN Yue-Feng. The Regulatory Structure of“Internet Plus”: A Case Study on“App-Based Ride and Taxi Services”[J]. , 2017(1): 17-31.