摘要： 诉权是程序法上的主观权。在不违反程序法的前提下，当事人有权依意思自治原则对诉权进行自由处分。诉权合同是当事人进行诉权处分的表现形式。我国民事司法实务对诉权合同的合法性予以认可，并且自发形成了较为成熟的裁判经验。宪法诉权说和诉权人权论等观点不符合经验性常识，是一种误导。我国司法裁判经验与法国、德国、日本等传统大陆法系国家的诉权理论及其司法实践不谋而合，而我国民事诉权理论的研究却远未能满足司法实务要求。民事诉讼研究中的“理论脱离实践”问题亟需得到改变。

关键词: 民事诉讼, 诉权, 诉权合同

Abstract: The right of action is the subjective right in procedural law.Under the premise of not violating the procedure law, the parties have the right to freely dispose of the right of action according to the principle of autonomy of will.The contract is an expression form of the parties to dispose of the right of action.The civil judicial practice of our country has recognized the legitimacy of the contract of right of action, and has formed some mature judicial experience.It is clear that the theories such as the constitutional right of action and the human rights of action are not in conformity with the empirical knowledge.The legal theory and judicial practice of France, Germany, Japan and other civil law countries are consistent with the judicial experience in China.Our civil action theory has failed to meet the requirements of judicial practice.In the civil procedure research, the problem of“theory divorced from practice”needs to be changed.

Key words: Civil Procedure, Right of action, Contract of Civil Right of Action