法学家 ›› 2017, Vol. 0 ›› Issue (6): 129-142.

• 论文 • 上一篇    下一篇

中立的帮助行为与客观归责理论

姚万勤,法学博士,西南政法大学法学院讲师,西南政法大学高等研究院特聘研究人员。   

  • 出版日期:2017-12-15 发布日期:2017-12-18

Neutral Help Behavior and Objective Imputation Theory

Yao Wanqin, Ph.D. in Law, Lecturer of Law School of Southwest University of Political Science and Law, Distinguished Research Fellow of Institute of Higher Learning in Southwest University of Political Science and Law.   

  • Online:2017-12-15 Published:2017-12-18

摘要: 中立的帮助行为处罚依据主要经历了从全面处罚到限制处罚的流变。由于全面处罚的观点与自由市场意识抵牾颇多而日渐凋敝,鲜有学者继续支持。目前的多种限制路径集中在限制处罚内部但并未对该问题的解决提供较为理想的方案。学界的最新理论动向旨在引入客观归责理论对该问题进行研究并逐渐成为解决中立帮助行为可罚性以及可罚范围的有力理论。虽然引入客观归责理论处理该问题有利于将处罚标准具体化,也契合了共犯的处罚根据,但是在借鉴该理论之时,应当根据该理论本身的内容进行梳理,即只有行为人不仅“制造了不被允许的危险”,而且“实现了不被允许的危险”之时,才能对其科以帮助犯的罪责。

关键词: 中立的帮助, 客观归责, 危险, 刑事可罚, 自我答责

Abstract: The punishment basis of the neutral help behavior has changed from full punishment to limited punishment.Because of the free market awareness and increasingly depressed comprehensive punishment contradictions, few scholars continue to support it.At present, there are many limitations in the limitation of punishment and the birth of a variety of restrictions on the path does not provide a better solution to the problem.The latest theoretical trend of the academic circles is to introduce the objective imputation theory to study the problem, and gradually become a powerful theory to solve the problem of the punishment and punishment of neutral help behavior.Although the introduction of objective imputation theory to deal with the problem will be specific, it will meet the standard of punishment according to the punishment of the accomplice, but in reference to the theory, it should be carried out according to the theory of combing the content itself.The behavior of people not only created a danger of “not allowed”, but also realized the danger is to commit crime to help families.

Key words: Neutral Help, Objective Imputation, Danger, Criminal Penalty