摘要：

反垄断法实施以来对纵向价格垄断协议案的处理越来越明显呈现出司法与行政规制路径上的二元对立，裕泰公司案的再审裁定试图协调并弥合认识上的分歧，但裁定中的解释仍不能为纵向价格垄断协议案件的处理指明清晰的认定路线和确立相对一致的认定模式。事实上，纵向价格垄断协议问题是一个系统性问题，它涉及整个垄断协议制度。问题产生的根源在于垄断协议概念内涵信息的不完整和概念外延划分方法的不恰当，并由此导致了原则适用上的错位。垄断协议制度的完善当从概念的完善开始，确定被定义项及其内涵，在此基础上采取概念外延划分的“三分法”，以此分别对应本身违法原则、合理原则和本身合法原则。

关键词: 垄断协议, 三分法, 原则错位, 制度重构

Abstract:

Since the implementation of the AntiMonopoly Law，the handling of vertical price monopoly agreement cases has become more and more evident in the binary opposition between judiciary and administrative regulations.The retrial ruling in the Case of Yutai Corporation tried to coordinate and bridge the divergences in understanding，but the interpretation in the ruling still failed to indicate a clear identification route and establish a relatively consistent identification model for the handling of vertical price monopoly agreement cases.In fact，the issue of vertical price monopoly agreement is a systemic issue，and it involves the entire monopoly agreement system.The source of the problem lies in the incomplete information of the concept connotation of the monopoly agreement and the improper method of dividing the concept extension，which leads to the dislocation of the principle application.Moreover，the implement of the monopoly agreement system should start with the perfection of the concept.Determine the defined items and their connotations at first，and then on this basis adopt the“trichotomy”of concept extension to correspond respectively to the per se rule，the reason rule，and the per se legality rule.

Key words: Monopoly Agreement, Trichotomy, Dislocation of the Principle, Institutional Reconstruction