摘要：

与学界以往仅将《民法典》第1077条有关“离婚冷静期”的规定看作是对个人自由之限制的观点不同，规范层面的分析表明，“离婚冷静期”制度是一种既不同于对离婚径直加以干预、也不同于对个人意愿完全放任的特殊制度，具有整体性和公共性的特质。这一制度除了具有维护婚姻家庭稳定的目标，同时也在整体意义上蕴含遵循婚姻自由原则、保护个体权利的目标预设。“离婚冷静期”制度在引导当事人进行多样态选择、回应社会需求方面有一定的意义，能因应离婚问题之本质和规范目标。相较来说，由于缺乏与其他机制的有效衔接，个体权利保护目标往往被忽视。从立法和法律实施的整体入手，促进相关机制的有效衔接和配合，对于在“离婚冷静期”内更好地保护个体权利具有重要意义。重述法律由事物本质决定的原则，以及秉持整体性视角，有助于准确把握法律设计的本意和法律实施的效果，同时也有助于更好地理解法律与社会互动的真切面向。

关键词: 民法典, 离婚冷静期, 婚姻自由, 个体权利, 整体性

Abstract: Different from the previous view that the“divorce cooling-off period”in Article 1077 of the Civil Code is only regarded as a restriction on personal freedom，the normative analysis shows that the“divorce cooling-off period”is a special system that is not only different from direct intervention in divorce，but also different from complete laissez-faire to individual wishes.It has the qualities of integrity and publicity.In addition to the goal of maintaining the stability of marriage and family，it also contains the goal of following the principle of freedom of marriage and protecting individual rights in an overall sense.This system has certain significance in guiding the parties to make diversified choices and respond to social needs，which can respond to the nature and normative goals of the divorce issue.In contrast，due to the lack of effective connection with other mechanisms，the goal of individual rights protection is often ignored.Starting from the overall legislation and implementation of laws，promoting the effective connection and cooperation of relevant mechanisms is of great significance to better protect individual rights during the“divorce cooling-off period”.Restating the principle that law is determined by the nature of things and adhering to a holistic perspective can help to accurately grasp the original intention of legal design and the effect of legal implementation，and help to better understand the true face of the interaction between law and society.

Key words: Civil Code, Divorce Cooling-off Period, Freedom of Marriage, Individual Rights, Integrity