摘要： 针对当前立法和行政中大量出现的非典型征收的财产权限制行为,“规制性征收”似乎提供了恰当的救济和保障的思路,其实证化的趋势也因此显现。但是,通过对征收规范的一味扩张,“规制性征收”存在引发“征收”泛化的可能性,从而颠倒财产权存续保障相对于价值保障的优先顺序,降低财产权保障的水平。与此同时,“规制性征收”概念本身的模糊性,也使其无法成为财产权“存续保障价值保障”二元结构下的理性的征收概念。因此,应当对“规制性征收”的实证化保持警惕,可行的路径就是坚守我国宪法上狭义的“征收”概念,并以此为基础,构建一个包含存续保障、价值保障的综合的财产权保障体系。

关键词: 征收, 规制性征收, 存续保障, 价值保障

Abstract: In response to the property rights restriction of atypical expropriation that appears in the current legislation and administration,“regulatory taking” seems to provide an appropriate idea of remedy and protection for property rights, and its tendency of empiricalization is thus apparent.However, through the expansion of taking clause,“regulatory taking” may lead to the generalization of “expropriation”, thus change the priority of Bestandsgarantie for property rights protection.At the same time, the ambiguity of the concept of “regulatory expropriation” makes it impossible to be a rational concept of expropriation under the dual structure of “Bestandsgarantie-Wertgarantie”.Therefore, we should be alert to the empiricalization of “regulatory taking”.The feasible path is to adhere to the concept of “expropriation” in the narrow sense of our constitutional law, and build a comprehensive property rights protection system that based on the “Bestandsgarantie-Wertgarantie” dual structure.

Key words: Expropriation, Regulatory Taking, Bestandsgarantie, Wertgarantie