法学家 ›› 2024, Vol. 0 ›› Issue (4): 1-14.

• 主题研讨:习近平法治思想的学理阐释 • 上一篇    下一篇

习近平法治思想中的司法体制改革理论

方乐   

  • 出版日期:2024-07-15 发布日期:2024-07-17
  • 作者简介:方乐,法学博士,南京师范大学法学院、中国法治现代化研究院教授。
  • 基金资助:
    *本文系国家社科基金重点项目“习近平法治思想中的司法体制改革理论体系研究”(23AFX001)和国家社科基金重大招标项目“习近平法治思想研究”(20&ZD004)的阶段性成果。

The Theory of Judicial System Reform in Xi Jinping's Thought on the Rule of Law

FANG Le   

  • Online:2024-07-15 Published:2024-07-17
  • About author:Fang Le, Ph.D. in Law, Professor of Nanjing Normal University Law School and Institute for Chinese Legal Modernization Studies.

摘要: 习近平法治思想中的司法体制改革理论,在领域内容上,主要由政治方向论、目标任务论、价值依归论、文化机理论、路径模式论等五个子理论构成;在原理结构上,深入阐释了中国特色社会主义司法的本体论、认识论、价值论、实践论层面的重大理论与实践问题,系统揭示出司法体制改革的政治属性、社会属性、价值属性、功能属性和规律属性;在实践逻辑上,遵循司法体制改革出发点和落脚点的确定以及两点之间运动轨迹的设定,科学部署了推进司法体制改革的路线图和任务书,系统规划了推进司法体制改革的路径和方法;在理论功能上,是新时代深入推进司法体制改革、迈向中国式司法现代化的理论指南和根本遵循。

关键词: 习近平法治思想, 司法体制改革, 公正司法, 司法为民, 中国式司法现代化

Abstract: The theoretical framework of judicial system reform in Xi Jinping's thought on the rule of law is primarily composed of five sub-theories: political direction, objectives and tasks, value orientation, cultural mechanisms, and pathways and models.These sub-theories provide an in-depth explanation of major theoretical and practical issues related to the ontology, epistemology, axiology, and praxeology of socialism with Chinese characteristics in the judicial field.The framework systematically reveals the political, social, value, functional, and law-like attributes of judicial system reform.Practically, it follows the logical determination of the starting and ending points of judicial reform and the trajectory between them, scientifically mapping out the roadmap and tasks for advancing judicial system reform, and systematically planning the pathways and methods for its implementation.Theoretically, it serves as a fundamental guide for deeply advancing judicial system reform, conducting judicial practice, and achieving judicial modernization in the new era.

Key words: Xi Jinping's Thought on the Rule of Law, Judicial System Reform, Fair Justice, Justice for the People, Chinese-style Judicial Modernization