摘要： 侵权赔偿责任的承担形态包括按份责任、连带责任、部分的连带责任、不真正连带责任以及相应的补充责任。连带责任的法定化并不要求每一种连带责任都必须有对应的法律条文规定。就多数人侵权责任而言,应当区分侵权赔偿责任的成立与承担这两个步骤。在各个侵权人的赔偿责任已经成立后,所有侵权人向被侵权人负担的究竟是按份责任还是连带责任,应依据《民法典》关于按份债务与连带债务的构成要件予以认定。由此形成的连带责任与部分的连带责任,并不违反连带责任法定化的要求。立法者针对多数人侵权所直接作出规定的连带责任都是基于更好地保护被侵权人、预防和制止侵权行为的法政策。部分的连带责任是基于肇因原则而产生的一种侵权赔偿责任承担形态,也是我国法早已承认的侵权赔偿责任承担形态,其有利于协调权益的保护与行为自由的维护。

关键词: 民法典, 连带责任, 连带债务, 法定化, 部分的连带责任

Abstract: The forms of liability for tort compensation include several types: several liability, joint liability, partial joint liability, quasi-joint liability, and corresponding supplementary liability.The statutory nature of joint liability does not require that every type of joint liability must be specifically provided for by corresponding legal provisions.In the case of liability for multiple tortfeasors, it is important to distinguish between the establishment of tort compensation liability and the assumption of that liability.Once the liability of each tortfeasor has been established, whether they are liable under several or joint liability should be determined based on the constitutive elements of several debts and joint debts as outlined in the Civil Code.The resulting joint liability and partial joint liability do not violate the requirement for the statutory nature of joint liability.The provisions made by lawmakers regarding joint liability in cases of multiple tortfeasors are aimed at better protecting the injured party and preventing and stopping tortious acts.Partial joint liability arises from the principle of causation and is a form of tort compensation liability that has long been recognized in our law, facilitating a balance between protecting rights and maintaining freedom of action.

Key words: ivil Code, Joint Liability, Joint Debt, Legalization, Partial Joint Liability