摘要： 长期以来,概念法学一直支配着《反不正当竞争法》的立法、司法和法学研究。有必要转向以规范目的为导向,以实质性价值判断为内容的评价法学方法论。反不正当竞争法属于侵权行为之法,市场竞争的固有逻辑决定了该法在规范性质上属于评价性规范。这主要表现在目的条款和一般条款处于核心地位,大部分概念属于“类型”概念,法律适用有赖于评价性类推等等。评价性规范意味着,无评价则无法律适用,法律的意义需在评价中实现;评价是一个商谈的程序性过程,无论辩则无评价,否定性评价的证伪意义重大。《反不正当竞争法》应通过引入多元的评价因素,在整体性评价的基础上揭示和发掘法律的意义,并进行利益平衡。

关键词: 反不正当竞争法, 评价规范, 评价法学, 方法论, 评价方法

Abstract: For a long time, conceptual jurisprudence has dominated the drafting, adjudication and academic study of the Anti-Unfair Competition Law.A shift in legal methodology is therefore needed toward an evaluative jurisprudence that is oriented by the purpose of each norm and grounded in substantive value judgments.The Anti-Unfair Competition Law is a branch of the Law of Tort.The inherent logic of market competition makes it, in its normative character, an evaluative regime.This is evident in several respects: the objective clause and the general clause of the law play a central role in application; most of its concepts are “typological”; and the law depends on evaluative application through analogy.Evaluative regime entails that without evaluation there can be no application of the law; the meaning of the law is realized only through evaluation.Evaluation is a dialogic procedural process: without deliberation there is no evaluation, and the falsification of negative evaluations is of decisive importance.The Anti-Unfair Competition Law should introduce a plurality of evaluative factors, uncover and articulate the meaning of the law through holistic evaluation, and on that basis strike a balance among competing interests.

Key words: Anti-Unfair Competition Law, Evaluation Regime, Evaluative Jurisprudence, Methodology, Evaluation Methods